MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER VS JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), MLS filed an opposition on 16 March 2018 against the trademark application submitted by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. Although MLS challenged the application, Jordan Older eventually decided to voluntarily withdraw his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), followed the typical practice in trademark law, where major corporations, such as Major League Soccer, aim to safeguard their brand by opposing independent applications. Jordan Older, despite the opposition from MLS, succeeded to avoid a lengthy legal conflict by choosing to abandon the application on his own terms, thereby avoiding possibly high-cost and protracted litigation.

The opposition was supervised by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with support staff support from Nicole M. Thier. Initially, a notice was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer required from Older by April 25, 2018. However, check here the matter was quickly settled on 5 April 2018, when the case was closed and terminated. The immediate conclusion implies that Jordan Older effectively navigated the complexities of the opposition process by voluntarily abandoning the mark, settling the case before any significant legal disputes developed.

This outcome reflects Older’s ability to settle the issue without delay, avoiding what could have been an arduous legal challenge from a major sports entity. His decision to voluntarily abandon the mark highlights his pragmatic decision, allowing him to bypass the expenses and drawn-out proceedings common in trademark disputes. Though Major League Soccer’s opposition never achieved a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case shows how smaller applicants can make strategic legal decisions to avoid disputes with powerful companies without becoming involved in extended litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.

Report this page